tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post5140607397525077476..comments2023-10-17T03:46:35.289-07:00Comments on Free Energy Tracker: K-Toy Video DiscoveredWill Gormanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11560983033718010747noreply@blogger.comBlogger49125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-1254548381005231842007-09-08T08:40:00.000-07:002007-09-08T08:40:00.000-07:00Finally someone managed to close the loop on k-toy...Finally someone managed to close the loop on k-toy. Here is the video:<BR/>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_naM8atOXE<BR/><BR/>The background voice sounds like magnatrix.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-91347031583778283202007-09-06T10:22:00.000-07:002007-09-06T10:22:00.000-07:00@MagnatrixOh... I forgot to address your remark a...@Magnatrix<BR/><BR/>Oh... I forgot to address your remark about "cross posting". Banning doesn't prevent anyone in any way from cross posting so banning for that purpose, like so many things done and said on Steorn's bizarre forum, makes absolutely no sense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-54365751447451680712007-09-06T10:16:00.000-07:002007-09-06T10:16:00.000-07:00About Magnatrix's comments, first, I certainly did...About Magnatrix's comments, first, I certainly did not put "Pennies" on my account profile-- I could not have because at the time, I'd never heard or read anything about "Pennies". So if you didn't do it, Crank or someone else who was grossly misusing their admin priviledges to misleadingly alter a user's profile must have done it.<BR/><BR/>Next, I am going to post links to a search for all posts I made on Steorn's forum so anyone can see how objective, non-insulting, and issue-oriented they were.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.steorn.com/forum/search.php?PostBackAction=Search&Keywords=maryyugo%3A&Type=Comments&btnSubmit=Search" REL="nofollow">Link to all posts on Steorn's forum by maryyugo.</A><BR/><BR/>Finally, I am providing a link to all (there were only three) emails exchanged between me and Magnatrix. The only edits are to remove email addresses and replace them with asterisks so robots can't pick them up to spam us with.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://maryyugo.freeservers.com/index.html" REL="nofollow">All emails I exchanged with Magnatrix.</A><BR/><BR/>From the above and much more information, anyone can see that Crank and Magnatrix have banned people and removed posts capriciously and with the general intent of protecting Steorn from their clearest and most effective critics.<BR/><BR/>Now Magnatrix, instead of personalities please address some simple issues:<BR/><BR/>1) Why is a jury necessary to test Steorn's wild claims of 450% overunity and 0.5 watts/cc power density when such claims are easily testable by any reasonably capable physics student in less than a day?<BR/><BR/>2) Why has Steorn never shown any overunity device to anyone capable of testing it properly?<BR/><BR/>3) If Steorn has any working overunity devices at all, why did Steorn drag Dr. Mike (and many others) thousands of miles to Kinetica and waste his week without showing him anything at all worth his effort?<BR/><BR/>Lots of luck making believable excuses.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-7780440134864430012007-09-06T08:00:00.000-07:002007-09-06T08:00:00.000-07:00Give it up Magnatrix. Stop trying to defend your a...Give it up Magnatrix. Stop trying to defend your actions. You were a bitch (using same word you used for MaryYugo) and banned MaryYugo because she was forceful and convincing, besmirching the reputation of your idol, Sean McCarthy. You used your power to remove her from the Steorn forums. You delude yourself about your 'fairness'. You're s Sean toadie.<BR/><BR/>It must really irk you that MaryYugo has technical and practical knowledge compared to your superstitions, fantasies and delusions.Thickethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00702305085714065466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-47160900334025780902007-09-06T05:15:00.000-07:002007-09-06T05:15:00.000-07:00Magnatrix said...you can't say fraud,hoax,liar,sca...Magnatrix said...<BR/>you can't say fraud,hoax,liar,scam, conman on steorn anymore<BR/><BR/><BR/>Would I be banned from Steorn if I said it was a macs or a duarf? or if I called Sean a rail or namnoc?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-81983075939347785742007-09-05T18:28:00.000-07:002007-09-05T18:28:00.000-07:00Anonymous wrote:---As I said to Mary, if you want ...Anonymous wrote:<BR/>---<BR/>As I said to Mary, if you want to be unbanned, send an email to one of the moderators explaining the mixup and politely and humbly ask to be unbanned.<BR/>---<BR/><BR/>I sent a message to Magnatrix. Here's her reply:<BR/>---<BR/>Hi XXXXXX<BR/> I'm sorry that that happened to you. you said "czech dream" and something else (cant remember now) that got Crank's back up. We had problems with certain posters previously and your post was along the lines of those people. <BR/> Rather then my having a discussion with crank about this, I would suggest just creating a new account ( you can even use the same email address as I editted the other one for this purpose).<BR/> Make a new account and then email me.. I'll unban it for you.<BR/>---<BR/><BR/>I rolled my eyes and thought to myself, "Whatever!" Banned essentially for ***mentioning*** Czech Dream? Good grief. lol<BR/><BR/>Anonymous wrote:<BR/>---<BR/>You should probably also apologize for the insults you have been hurling at the moderators.<BR/>---<BR/><BR/>Yeah, uh-huh. Right. Sorry, but the evidence clearly shows they're chock-full-o-nuts. "As advertised," ya know?<BR/><BR/>Anonymous wrote:<BR/>---<BR/>If you aren't mature and humble enough to do those things, you aren't worth unbanning, are you?<BR/>---<BR/><BR/>I'm immature?! HAHAHAHA! Oh man...LMAO....Walterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09055256262638094841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-2603464381646181882007-09-05T15:03:00.000-07:002007-09-05T15:03:00.000-07:00For the final time, she was not banned for being "...For the final time, she was not banned for being "pennies" ( & again, I liked pennies, and had a few enjoyable conversations with her/him). <BR/> She was banned for, well to put it frankly, being a bitch. Besides not being able contain herself on her cynicism, ( you can't say fraud,hoax,liar,scam, conman on steorn anymore) She kept essentially thumbing her nose at me, when asked to not cross post what I said, that had been removed.<BR/><BR/>I said something a long the lines of, if you come back on (to steorn.com) you would not be able to not say ( the above mentioned) banned words. <BR/>( yes, that was a double negative sentence..lol)<BR/> and "she" said something like " I see your point"... which I take as a confirmation that "she" would not be able to hold her tongue.<BR/><BR/>so I created the skeptics section on fizzx.com, and invited her to join it ( I even enabled her account there for "her")<BR/><BR/>You can't expect me to be taking crap all the time and not retaliate. I'm sorry that I'm a person, and my feelings do actually have barring on my actions, but there it is. <BR/> Anyone who admins a forum, would encounter the same sort of conflicts. <BR/> I'd like to be "fair" for the most part, but sometimes I might not be. I'm human. <BR/><BR/>So Mary, maybe if you hadn't kept on & on about me, every chance you got, I might have changed my mind, (I see that your "scientific knowledge" has increased 10 fold since you started this. And good for you, really I mean that with good intentions), but you've gone way too far with your attacks and I won't be reinstating you anytime soon ( which is not to say "never".. I have un-banned several people)... and I suppose that's fine for you because you just stated that you weren't interested in posting on steorn.com anyway.<BR/><BR/>(rhetorical question: so if you really aren't interested, why do you keep bringing it up?)<BR/><BR/>Magnatrix<BR/><BR/>ps- I don't know how many times I have had to say this: I DID NOT put the "pennies" name on maryyugo's account.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09297575167695075939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-45262341173854766352007-09-05T11:43:00.000-07:002007-09-05T11:43:00.000-07:00I love the 70's porno music in the background.I love the 70's porno music in the background.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-60064292204654255832007-09-04T08:29:00.000-07:002007-09-04T08:29:00.000-07:00Why should maryyugo apologize?If she was banned be...Why should maryyugo apologize?<BR/>If she was banned because of mixup, then that's the only thing she should explain..<BR/>And it's Magnatrix who should be apologizing for the insults.<BR/><BR/>Also Magnatrix should propose modification to the forum TOS, explicitly stating, that questioning "Babcat's logic" becomes a bannable offense.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-27948011563787594922007-09-04T08:15:00.000-07:002007-09-04T08:15:00.000-07:00"Mary, if Magnatrix confused you with someone else..."Mary, if Magnatrix confused you with someone else, I am sure that if you politely explain that to her, and humbly ask to be reinstated, she will unban you. All you need to do is send an email to her contact address. "<BR/><BR/>I sent a very polite request at the time and I was ignored. I still have that email somewhere so if it interest you, I can post it here.<BR/><BR/>You have to remember that Magnatrix and Crank rarely say why people are banned and rarely warn people when their exquisitely sensitive sensibilities are being offended. Ask humbly you say? What do you think these two illogical and arbitrary censors who seem to know absolutely nothing of science or technology are? Royalty?<BR/><BR/>At this point in time, why bother to post to the Steorn forum? Among the remaining credophiles, nut cases and whackoes are a few reasonable people who know how science works and they're doing a fine job of responding to the woowoo's.<BR/><BR/>As for Steorn, they finished off what remained of any credibility they might have had when they flopped at Kinetica and were unable to show anything else of value to Dr. Mike or other attendees.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-48703993446793618692007-09-04T05:29:00.000-07:002007-09-04T05:29:00.000-07:00Skidoo said... Same EXACT thing happened to me....Skidoo said...<BR/> Same EXACT thing happened to me. Except it wasn't Magnatrix who banned me, but that other paranoid schizophrenic, Crank. Although, to be fair, I don't know the reason she banned the person she thought I was. Wacky Steorn shills. Sheeple with Napoleon complexes. :-) <BR/><BR/>As I said to Mary, if you want to be unbanned, send an email to one of the moderators explaining the mixup and politely and humbly ask to be unbanned.<BR/><BR/>You should probably also apologize for the insults you have been hurling at the moderators.<BR/><BR/>If you aren't mature and humble enough to do those things, you aren't worth unbanning, are you?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-11669561068767426802007-09-04T05:10:00.000-07:002007-09-04T05:10:00.000-07:00maryyugo said...You banned me on the suspicion tha...maryyugo said...<BR/><BR/>You banned me on the suspicion that I was someone else-- someone else whom you banned for no valid reason.<BR/><BR/>Mary, if Magnatrix confused you with someone else, I am sure that if you politely explain that to her, and humbly ask to be reinstated, she will unban you. All you need to do is send an email to her contact address.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-81957027214360896692007-09-03T20:21:00.000-07:002007-09-03T20:21:00.000-07:00maryyugo wrote: ----I should know. You banned me o...maryyugo wrote: <BR/>----<BR/>I should know. You banned me on the suspicion that I was someone else-- someone else whom you banned for no valid reason.<BR/>----<BR/>Same EXACT thing happened to me. Except it wasn't Magnatrix who banned me, but that other paranoid schizophrenic, Crank. Although, to be fair, I don't know the reason she banned the person she thought I was. Wacky Steorn shills. Sheeple with Napoleon complexes. :-)Walterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09055256262638094841noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-64921471564497916312007-09-03T16:07:00.000-07:002007-09-03T16:07:00.000-07:00What, and lose the element of surprise? ;-)What, and lose the element of surprise? ;-)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-28676602318614830432007-09-03T09:43:00.000-07:002007-09-03T09:43:00.000-07:00Yo Mags,What ever happened to the "webfile" you su...Yo Mags,<BR/><BR/>What ever happened to the "webfile" you supposedly saw?<BR/><BR/>Where are the "100,00" toys?<BR/><BR/>Where is Sean?<BR/><BR/>Where is Babcats reasoning ability?<BR/><BR/>Where are the "super 7"?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-38575153672490325752007-09-03T09:01:00.000-07:002007-09-03T09:01:00.000-07:00@MagnatrixI was stating facts, not insulting you. ...@Magnatrix<BR/><BR/><BR/>I was stating facts, not insulting you. Want some insults? See below (and even that is the truth):<BR/><BR/>Any "suggestion" by you has to be taken as a threat to ban because you ban capriciously, without warning, and you tend to ban those who make cogent and sensible arguments against Steorn's claims. I should know. You banned me on the suspicion that I was someone else-- someone else whom you banned for no valid reason. <BR/><BR/><I>"Ever notice that you appear to be always attacking, and/or bitching & complaining about everyone?"</I><BR/><BR/>Uh... no, I didn't notice that. Usually I am "bitching and complaining" about ridiculous and obvious nonsense propagated in that absurdly one sided forum you moderate. Complaining about Steorn is entirely logical-- they have wasted thousands of people's expectations, honest interest, money, and time. <BR/><BR/>It seems fairly clear by now that, for whatever reason, Steorn lied about having a working device,and, at best, they were "mistaken" about the need for a "jury" and there's been no evidence since the first announcement that a jury exists. If there is one, they are suspiciously quiet. <BR/><BR/>Your co-moderator Crank could call two supposed jury members but of course she doesn't want to burst the idiot bubble so she doesn't. <BR/><BR/>Now, FYI, the comments below are the only part of anything I wrote about you which could remotely be called insulting-- and even that is fact:<BR/><BR/>You and Crank are pitiful. You can't seem to put a logical thought together from both of your brains.<BR/><BR/>@"anonymous" who's thinking of visiting Kinetron. Good luck with that. If you do get in, keep good notes and take a camera with you if they allow it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-34719974364766709952007-09-03T08:12:00.000-07:002007-09-03T08:12:00.000-07:00Hey Magnatrix, what was the reason you banned Mary...Hey Magnatrix, what was the reason you banned Maryyugo?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-78565311713669514512007-09-03T05:37:00.000-07:002007-09-03T05:37:00.000-07:00Anonymous said... I'm going to be passing thru ...Anonymous said...<BR/><BR/> I'm going to be passing thru Tilburg in the next couple of weeks... I'll see if I can speak to Mr. Knapen and ask him what's up.<BR/><BR/><BR/>Maybe you should email him first and find out if he has any interest in meeting with you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-21898045705693168732007-09-02T21:45:00.000-07:002007-09-02T21:45:00.000-07:00@ Marystop attacking me. You are wrong again. I di...@ Mary<BR/>stop attacking me. <BR/><BR/>You are wrong again.<BR/><BR/> I didn't threaten to ban someone for attacking babcat.<BR/>( although I certainly could have)<BR/><BR/> I told him to stop,& told him why it was an attack.<BR/>I questioned the motive.<BR/> I told him th that if he wished to discuss with babacat about this subject (which was off-topic,btw), that he should ask babcat for his email or chat-handle(s).<BR/><BR/>Ever notice that you appear to be always attacking, and/or bitching & complaining about everyone?<BR/><BR/>I hope this is just your online persona, and not your regular state; otherwise, that would be just sad<BR/><BR/>Best Wishes :-)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09297575167695075939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-35171889541659352462007-09-02T09:51:00.000-07:002007-09-02T09:51:00.000-07:00I'm going to be passing thru Tilburg in the next c...I'm going to be passing thru Tilburg in the next couple of weeks... I'll see if I can speak to Mr. Knapen and ask him what's up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-77399992129471998572007-09-02T09:16:00.000-07:002007-09-02T09:16:00.000-07:00In the Steorn forums, the question has come up: Di...In the Steorn forums, the question has come up: Did Sean think of the Kinetica toy as clearly showing overunity? (not in exactly those words). Someone linked to the answer:<BR/><BR/>"Skeptical" asks: <I>"The Kinetica Toy video was shown and that certainly wasn't OU! Again, the impression was it demonstrated "some feature" of their technology. If it didn't why show it? So I suppose the same can be asked of the post-validation PR toy. Maybe it will be like one of those toys you get at McDonalds. "</I><BR/><BR/>Sean replies:<BR/><BR/>"lol, the power of assumption strikes again, in fact the 'Kinetica Toy' showed a far greater level of OU than we understood at the time - the point is that there is no way to defend a video without test data and there is no way that such test data can be seen as real. The point about the products is that unlike the version of the Kinetica toy 'seen on video' there is no manual intervention, they self sustain. <BR/><BR/>Sean"<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=59489&page=5" REL="nofollow">The current Steorn forum thread.</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.steorn.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=51921#Item_13" REL="nofollow">What Sean said about the Kinetica Toy (permalink)</A><BR/><BR/>Uhhun. So where are those versions and products now? And if the Kinetica Toy was overunity, where's the evidence for that other than what someone says?<BR/><BR/>The current Steorn forum thread is also amazing because Babcat again and again restates that the problem for Steorn is that people won't believe them if they have overunity. That is beyond extremely silly to such an extent that it is absolutely amazing a human being who can put on his pants in the morning without help believes it. <BR/><BR/>And noteworthy: Magnatrix threatened to ban someone who pointed out how absurd Babacat is and dared to quote that Steorn Forum pariah James Randi. Good going Magnatrix-- your insecurities are showing again.<BR/><BR/>As if anyone could possibly or conceivably want to stop 450% overunity and 0.5W/cc power generation if it were true. Some people are really so ignorant and bullheaded, it's wasteful to answer them. Most of them will NEVER learn. They are logic (and fact)-immune. Sadly, though he may be a "nice person", Babcat falls squarely in that category. <BR/><BR/>Why bring these links and quotes up now? Because they demonstrate that the only perpetual thing Sean and the guy in the video both have is a huge lot of perpetual bullshit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-43506809095486423712007-09-02T06:00:00.000-07:002007-09-02T06:00:00.000-07:00----------- Another interesting thing is that t...-----------<BR/> Another interesting thing is that this video is unlisted, which means that runningbare did not find it through google videos by chance as he claims.<BR/> Here's what google says about unlisted videos<BR/><BR/> http://video.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=48320<BR/>-------------<BR/><BR/>Maybe the video found him. You never know what happens next in a world where things like free energy and money trees exist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-36513165064817884822007-09-01T15:38:00.000-07:002007-09-01T15:38:00.000-07:00Another interesting thing is that this video is un...Another interesting thing is that this video is unlisted, which means that runningbare did not find it through google videos by chance as he claims.<BR/>Here's what google says about unlisted videos <BR/><BR/>http://video.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=48320Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-57023113270242906482007-08-31T19:32:00.000-07:002007-08-31T19:32:00.000-07:00>They have been working on it over 2 years, they h...>They have been working on it over 2 years, they have a very full trash can and nothing else.<BR/><BR/>Four years ( three years leading up to the Economist ad and a year since then).<BR/><BR/>Four years and they cannot put on a simple demo. Four years and they have no proof. A year without any income or outcome.<BR/><BR/>A great way to usher in a new age. I cannot wait to see this documentary they got cooking.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2087544938250245173.post-66794221776518001122007-08-31T17:09:00.000-07:002007-08-31T17:09:00.000-07:00Is there anything that Steorn have come up with th...Is there anything that Steorn have come up with that has stood up to scrutiny, once sufficient information has been given to prove or disprove it?<BR/><BR/>All the claims and "toys" Steorn come up with get binned, but yet some people still believe they might have something.<BR/><BR/>K-toy - BINNED<BR/>Nodding donkey - BINNED<BR/>550 HP claim - BINNED<BR/>Kinetica demo - BINNED<BR/>Steorn - ...<BR/><BR/>They have been working on it over 2 years, they have a very full trash can and nothing else.bchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12014883276329736216noreply@blogger.com